Claims assessment · Entity claim
Climate-conscious brand
Typical treatment across 5 reviewed regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
5 reviewed markets · one comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Restricted | View legal reasoningEmpCo Annex I (generic claims banned); UCPD Art. 6 | Generic environmental claims without demonstrated recognised excellent performance are prohibited from 27 Sep 2026; must specify the concrete attribute. |
| United KingdomUK | Restricted | View legal reasoningCMA Green Claims Code | Vague brand-level claims fail the 'meaningful, specific' test; ASA enforcement. |
| United StatesUS | Conditional | View legal reasoningFTC Green Guides 260.4 | Unqualified general-benefit claims presumptively deceptive; narrow qualification required. |
| CanadaCA | Restricted | View legal reasoningCompetition Act s.74.01(1)(b.1)–(b.2), as amended by Bill C-15 (2026) | Product-level claims need an Dictionary termAdequate and proper testProduct-level environmental benefit claim requires testing **before** the claim; test must fit the claim's representationRead the full definition ; business/activity-level claims need Dictionary termSubstantiationThe documented body of relevant, reliable and current evidence that supports the exact wording, scope, comparison and overall impression of a claim before and while it is communicated.Read the full definition (the internationally recognised methodology requirement was repealed); reverse onus remains; private Tribunal access for business-level claims was removed. |
| AustraliaAU | Restricted | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningACL s.18; ACCC 2023-24 sweeps | Generic brand claims are an ACCC priority; specific evidence required. |
Review your exact wording
Next, add your wording, evidence and market context for a guided review.
Review your exact wording