Claims assessment · Entity claim

We offset all our emissions

Typical treatment across 5 reviewed regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.

Market comparison

How this claim is typically treated

5 reviewed markets · one comparison

MarketTypical treatmentLegal basisWhat is required
European UnionEURestricted
View legal reasoning

EmpCo Annex I (offset-based product claims banned); CSRD/ESRS E1-7 credit disclosure

Product-level neutrality-by-offsetting prohibited from 27 Sep 2026; entity-level claims must separate gross emissions, reductions and credits; credits disclosed per Dictionary termESRS E1The European Sustainability Reporting Standard setting disclosure requirements on climate change.Read the full definition -7.

United KingdomUKConditional
View legal reasoning

CMA Green Claims Code

Quantify offset share vs reductions; disclose credit standard and vintage; no neutrality implication without full boundary.

United StatesUSConditional
View legal reasoning

FTC Green Guides 260.5; CA AB 1305

Competent evidence offsets represent real additional reductions; AB 1305 website disclosures for CA claimants.

CanadaCARestricted
View legal reasoning

Competition Act s.74.01(1)(b.1)–(b.2), as amended by Bill C-15 (2026)

Product-level claims need an Dictionary termAdequate and proper testProduct-level environmental benefit claim requires testing **before** the claim; test must fit the claim's representationRead the full definition ; business/activity-level claims need Dictionary termSubstantiationThe documented body of relevant, reliable and current evidence that supports the exact wording, scope, comparison and overall impression of a claim before and while it is communicated.Read the full definition (the internationally recognised methodology requirement was repealed); reverse onus remains; private Tribunal access for business-level claims was removed.

AustraliaAUConditional

A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment.

View legal reasoning

ACL s.18; ACCC offset guidance

ACCC expects heavy reduction-first framing; offset quality and retirement evidence.

Last reviewed 22 Aug 2026This is an informational comparison, not legal advice.

Review your exact wording

Next, add your wording, evidence and market context for a guided review.

Review your exact wording
Important limit

This is an informational reference, not legal advice. Verdicts reflect the typical use of this claim; exact wording, product, market and date can change the assessment.

Last verified 2026-08-22.

Review this entry