Standards & schemes

Gold Standard

Gold Standard Foundation

Carbon market
Issuer / operator
Gold Standard Foundation
Geography
Global
Sectors
Carbon credits with SDG co-benefits
Scope unit
Project
Current edition
Gold Standard for the Global Goals (GS4GG) + rolling requirement updates
Edition status
Published
Next edition review
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact
Access to standard text
Free
Certified unit
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact
Assurance route
Third-party certification body
Chain-of-custody model
Registry
On-product label
No
Grievance / complaints
Gold Standard grievance procedure
ISEAL status
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact

In brief

What this profile covers

Gold Standard is a carbon-credit standard founded by WWF and other NGOs in 2003, now operating as Gold Standard for the Global Goals (GS4GG). Its distinguishing requirement is quantified sustainable-development co-benefits: every certified project must demonstrate contributions to at least three UN Sustainable Development Goals, measured under its own SDG methodologies, alongside verified emission reductions. Credits are issued to a public registry, and the programme publishes methodologies, requirements and project documentation. Gold Standard also operates rules for organisational claims — including guidance on what companies may say when retiring credits — which has made it a reference point in debates over offsetting integrity and "carbon neutral" product claims. Its units are among those assessed under CORSIA eligibility and ICVCM's Core Carbon Principles. A retired credit supports a compensation claim only for the stated tonnes within the programme's rules; it does not by itself substantiate broader neutrality or impact wording, and the credit's vintage, methodology and co-benefit evidence all condition what may be claimed.

Conditional relationships

Claims it may support

A relationship does not mean that the standard proves or validates every use of a claim.

Carbon neutral productMay support subject to conditions · Requires a current valid certificate within the scheme's scope; certification supports but does not by itself prove the claim — wording must reflect certified scope and assurance level.
Evidence and conditions
Edition reviewed
Gold Standard for the Global Goals (GS4GG) + rolling requirement updates
Covered scope
Project / credit
Market
Global
Evidence normally needed
Current certificate from an accredited/approved certification body, valid for the claimed product, site or scope
Assurance
Accredited third-party validation/verification bodies
Chain of custody
Registry issuance and retirement of GS-verified credits — claim wording must reflect this custody model
Relationship source ↗
We offset all our emissionsMay support subject to conditions · Requires a current valid certificate within the scheme's scope; certification supports but does not by itself prove the claim — wording must reflect certified scope and assurance level.
Evidence and conditions
Edition reviewed
Gold Standard for the Global Goals (GS4GG) + rolling requirement updates
Covered scope
Project / credit
Market
Global
Evidence normally needed
Current certificate from an accredited/approved certification body, valid for the claimed product, site or scope
Assurance
Accredited third-party validation/verification bodies
Chain of custody
Registry issuance and retirement of GS-verified credits — claim wording must reflect this custody model
Relationship source ↗

Recognition & legal context

Laws referencing it

No reviewed law references are published.

Provenance4 profile updates
Profile update 4
Imported source-linked claim and dictionary relationship reviews. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 3
Added source-linked instrument, organisation and conformity classifications. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 2
Initial profile published after recorded site-owner/editor review of the complete standards batch.
Profile update 1
Initial private editorial draft imported from the reviewed standards handover.

Have evidence, context or a correction?

Suggest a correction