Non-financial reporting

What it means in practice

Non-financial reporting should be used with care because reporting terms often connect technical definitions to governance, assurance and public communication. The practical question is what decision the term helps a reader make.

In practice, users should state the boundary, method, evidence and intended audience. That keeps non-financial reporting from becoming a loose label that hides important assumptions.

Why it matters

Non-financial reporting sits in reporting and disclosure language, where the same phrase can affect scope, assurance, investor interpretation and regulatory presentation.

Common misconception

A common error is to treat Non-financial reporting as self-explanatory. The stronger approach is to state the framework, reporting boundary, audience and evidence that give the term meaning.

Review questions

What framework or method is being used? What evidence supports the term? What would a reader reasonably assume if the boundary is not stated?

How it is used

Standard setters, scheme owners, certification bodies, auditors and organisations seeking assurance use “Non-financial reporting” in standards, certification, conformity assessment, audits, controls and assurance engagements.

In each case, the user should state the named standard or scheme, version, scope, criteria, assurance level and competent decision-maker; otherwise, the same term may be applied to materially different situations. In this context, it refers to disclosure about environmental, social, governance and other matters that are not expressed solely through traditional financial statements.