Standards & schemes

ISO 14064-1/-2/-3

ISO

Standard
Issuer / operator
ISO
Geography
Global
Sectors
All sectors
Scope unit
Company
Current edition
ISO 14064-1:2018; -2:2019; -3:2019
Edition status
Published
Next edition review
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact
Access to standard text
Paid
Binding status
Voluntary, referenced by law
Binding in
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact
Materiality lens
Not applicable
Reporting / measurement unit
Company
Assurance expectation
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact
Interoperability
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact
Instrument kind
Measurement

In brief

What this profile covers

ISO 14064 is the three-part standard for greenhouse gas accounting and verification. Part 1 (2018) specifies requirements for quantifying and reporting organisational GHG emissions and removals; Part 2 (2019) covers projects and reduction or removal activities; Part 3 (2019) governs the verification and validation of GHG statements, defining how an assurance engagement over emissions data is performed. Where the GHG Protocol provides the corporate accounting methodology most companies actually use, ISO 14064-3 is the rulebook assurance providers commonly apply when verifying reported emissions, and the two systems are converging under the ISO–GHG Protocol harmonisation partnership announced in 2025. The three parts interlock: a company quantifies under Part 1, a project developer under Part 2, and the verifier who examines either applies Part 3. In practice, market usage is split — most corporate inventories follow the GHG Protocol's methodology while assurance statements reference ISO 14064-3 — and the harmonisation partnership between ISO and GHG Protocol is intended to close that methodological gap over the coming revision cycle. Using this framework does not by itself verify data accuracy, legal compliance or sustainability performance.

Conditional relationships

Claims it may support

A relationship does not mean that the standard proves or validates every use of a claim.

“Removes CO₂ from the atmosphere” (carbon removal)Provides evidence relevant to · Disclosure against this standard provides evidence relevant to the claim; the standard does not certify performance.
Evidence and conditions
Edition reviewed
ISO 14064-1:2018; -2:2019; -3:2019
Covered scope
Company / project / verification
Market
Global
Evidence normally needed
Published disclosure/report prepared in accordance with the standard; separate assurance statement where the claim implies independent verification
Assurance
ISO 14064-3 verification standard
Chain of custody
Not applicable — the scheme defines no chain-of-custody model
Relationship source ↗
Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions independently verifiedProvides evidence relevant to · Disclosure against this standard provides evidence relevant to the claim; the standard does not certify performance.
Evidence and conditions
Edition reviewed
ISO 14064-1:2018; -2:2019; -3:2019
Covered scope
Company / project / verification
Market
Global
Evidence normally needed
Published disclosure/report prepared in accordance with the standard; separate assurance statement where the claim implies independent verification
Assurance
ISO 14064-3 verification standard
Chain of custody
Not applicable — the scheme defines no chain-of-custody model
Relationship source ↗

Recognition & legal context

Laws referencing it

No reviewed law references are published.

Provenance5 profile updates
Profile update 5
Imported source-linked claim and dictionary relationship reviews. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 4
Added source-linked instrument, organisation and conformity classifications. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 3
Applied the owner/editor-approved Review 01 source and edition corrections. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 2
Initial profile published after recorded site-owner/editor review of the complete standards batch.
Profile update 1
Initial private editorial draft imported from the reviewed standards handover.

Have evidence, context or a correction?

Suggest a correction