Claim Explorer · reviewed example · Entity/finance claim
1.5°C-aligned” / “Paris-aligned
This page shows the EU-level EmpCo assessment. EU-27 country research keeps national implementation and unresolved country questions separate.
When the EmpCo rules apply
Member States must apply their measures implementing Directive (EU) 2024/825 from . This EU assessment does not decide how a specific claim is treated in a Member State.
Read the official Directive · Article 4(1) · Source checked .
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
1 of 1 active market with a published assessment
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Restricted | View legal reasoningSFDR/Taxonomy for funds; CSRD E1-1; UCPD future claims | Validated pathway; disclose Dictionary termMetricA defined method of quantification or calculation, including its unit, formula, boundary and data rules, used to express an aspect of performance or condition.Read the full definition scope (portfolio vs operations) |
EU-27 context
Need country context?
Choose the market where the claim will appear. The EU Directive is the starting point; the country record shows the national source and questions still to check.
Review your exact wording with a market · Compare all 27 countries
What this country research does
It records dated sources and open questions; it does not decide that a claim is permitted in that market. The register began on 2026-08-28, and later findings carry their own check dates.
Review your exact wording
Next, add your wording, evidence and market context for a guided review.
Review this claimEvidence context
Standards and schemes relevant to this claim
These relationships are conditional. A listed standard does not automatically prove every use of the claim.
Relationship review basis
Standards review 02 · source-linked relationship review · 24 August 2026
Alignment with the framework is relevant evidence; frameworks define process, not outcomes — claim wording must not imply certification.
GFANZ guidance suite (post-2025 restructure)IIGCC Net Zero Investment FrameworkMeta-framework · Provides evidence relevant toAlignment with the framework is relevant evidence; frameworks define process, not outcomes — claim wording must not imply certification.
Net Zero Investment Framework 2.0SBTi Target ValidationRating platform · Provides evidence relevant toRating/score is third-party assessment evidence; verify scope, year and methodology version before citing.
Corporate Net-Zero Standard V1.3.1 + Near-Term Criteria V5.3.1 (ACA v3.0.1, 2026-04-29)