Sustainability Language
Menu

Standards & schemes

GFANZ & net-zero alliances (NZBA, NZAM, NZIA, NZAOA)

Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero

Initiative
Issuer / operator
Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero
Geography
Global
Sectors
Financial institutions
Scope unit
Company
Current edition
GFANZ guidance suite (post-2025 restructure)
Edition status
Published
Next edition review
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact
Access to standard text
Free
Alignment mechanism
Membership commitment
Instrument level
Organisation
Public versioned standard
Yes
Verification route
None
Coverage vs target
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact

In brief

What this profile covers

GFANZ — the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero — is the umbrella for financial-sector net-zero alliances (NZBA for banks, NZAM for asset managers, NZIA for insurers, NZAOA for asset owners and others), formed at COP26 to coordinate financed-emissions commitments. Following its 2025 restructure, GFANZ repositioned from membership tracking toward a guidance publisher: the alliance framework and its guidance suite remain the reference for how financial institutions set portfolio targets, while member commitments are tracked by the individual alliances. Membership is a stated commitment with published expectations, not an audited condition; alliance exits (notably among US banks in 2024–25) demonstrated that commitments are voluntary and revocable. Each alliance keeps its own commitment text and target-setting protocols, so a bank's NZBA membership and an insurer's NZIA membership rest on different rulebooks. GFANZ's published progress reports aggregate alliance-reported data rather than independently verified figures. Alignment with these principles is a stated position, not a certification; it does not by itself demonstrate compliance or outcomes.

Conditional relationships

Claims it may support

A relationship does not mean that the standard proves or validates every use of a claim.

1.5°C-aligned” / “Paris-alignedProvides evidence relevant to · Alignment with the framework is relevant evidence; frameworks define process, not outcomes — claim wording must not imply certification.
Evidence and conditions
Edition reviewed
GFANZ guidance suite (post-2025 restructure)
Covered scope
Company (financial institution)
Market
Global
Evidence normally needed
Documented alignment with the framework's criteria (targets, disclosures or methodology as applicable)
Assurance
Self-commitment with alliance-level accountability and target reporting; aligned with TPT/ISSB disclosure
Chain of custody
Not applicable — the scheme defines no chain-of-custody model
Relationship source ↗
Net-zero portfolio by 2050Provides evidence relevant to · Alignment with the framework is relevant evidence; frameworks define process, not outcomes — claim wording must not imply certification.
Evidence and conditions
Edition reviewed
GFANZ guidance suite (post-2025 restructure)
Covered scope
Company (financial institution)
Market
Global
Evidence normally needed
Documented alignment with the framework's criteria (targets, disclosures or methodology as applicable)
Assurance
Self-commitment with alliance-level accountability and target reporting; aligned with TPT/ISSB disclosure
Chain of custody
Not applicable — the scheme defines no chain-of-custody model
Relationship source ↗

Recognition & legal context

Laws referencing it

No reviewed law references are published.

Provenance5 profile updates
Profile update 5
Imported source-linked claim and dictionary relationship reviews. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 4
Added source-linked instrument, organisation and conformity classifications. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 3
Applied the owner/editor-approved Review 01 source and edition corrections. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 2
Initial profile published after recorded site-owner/editor review of the complete standards batch.
Profile update 1
Initial private editorial draft imported from the reviewed standards handover.

Have evidence, context or a correction?

Suggest a correction