Standards & schemes

Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)

GOTS International

Certification
Issuer / operator
GOTS International
Geography
Global
Sectors
Textiles
Scope unit
Product
Current edition
GOTS v7.0 (current); GOTS v8.0 released 2026-03
Edition status
Published
Next edition review
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact
Access to standard text
Free
Certified unit
Product
Assurance route
Third-party certification body
Chain-of-custody model
Identity preserved
On-product label
Yes
Grievance / complaints
GOTS complaints
ISEAL status
Member

In brief

What this profile covers

The Global Organic Textile Standard is the leading processing standard for organic fibres, covering the full textile chain from ginning through spinning, weaving, dyeing and manufacture to the final labelled product. It has two label grades: "organic" (≥95% certified organic fibres) and "made with organic" (≥70%), and it combines fibre-content rules with environmental criteria — notably restrictions on toxic inputs such as azo dyes and requirements for wastewater treatment at wet-processing facilities — plus social criteria based on International Labour Organization norms. Certification is annual, by accredited certification bodies, with identity-preserved traceability through each processing stage, and certified entities appear in a public database. GOTS v7.0 is current; v8.0 was released in March 2026 with transition underway. Only textile products carrying a valid licence number from a GOTS-certified entity may use the label, and the public database allows the number to be traced to the certified company and scope. GOTS certification of the final product requires every processing step to be certified, which is why transaction certificates matter at each hand-off. Certification supports a claim only within the certified scope and label grade; it does not by itself prove outcomes or validate wording beyond that scope.

Conditional relationships

Claims it may support

A relationship does not mean that the standard proves or validates every use of a claim.

100% sustainable cottonMay support subject to conditions · Requires a current valid certificate within the scheme's scope; certification supports but does not by itself prove the claim — wording must reflect certified scope and assurance level.
Evidence and conditions
Edition reviewed
GOTS v7.0 (current); GOTS v8.0 released 2026-03
Covered scope
Product / processing chain
Market
Global
Evidence normally needed
Current certificate from an accredited/approved certification body, valid for the claimed product, site or scope
Assurance
Third-party audits each processing stage
Chain of custody
Identity-preserved through processing — claim wording must reflect this custody model
Relationship source ↗
Made with recycled fibresMay support subject to conditions · Requires a current valid certificate within the scheme's scope; certification supports but does not by itself prove the claim — wording must reflect certified scope and assurance level.
Evidence and conditions
Edition reviewed
GOTS v7.0 (current); GOTS v8.0 released 2026-03
Covered scope
Product / processing chain
Market
Global
Evidence normally needed
Current certificate from an accredited/approved certification body, valid for the claimed product, site or scope
Assurance
Third-party audits each processing stage
Chain of custody
Identity-preserved through processing — claim wording must reflect this custody model
Relationship source ↗

Recognition & legal context

Laws referencing it

No reviewed law references are published.

Provenance4 profile updates
Profile update 4
Imported source-linked claim and dictionary relationship reviews. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 3
Added source-linked instrument, organisation and conformity classifications. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 2
Initial profile published after recorded site-owner/editor review of the complete standards batch.
Profile update 1
Initial private editorial draft imported from the reviewed standards handover.

Have evidence, context or a correction?

Suggest a correction