Claims assessment · Target claim
Responsibly source 12 priority ingredients by 2030
Typical treatment across 5 reviewed regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
5 reviewed markets · one comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Conditional | View legal reasoningUCPD | Per-ingredient criteria published; priority-list rationale; progress per ingredient not just aggregate. |
| United KingdomUK | Conditional | View legal reasoningCMA Code | Criteria + progress per ingredient. |
| United StatesUS | Conditional | View legal reasoningFTC 260.4 | Sourcing data per ingredient. |
| CanadaCA | Conditional | View legal reasoningCompetition Act s.74.01(1)(b.1) | Dictionary termVerificationThe evidence-based confirmation that a claim about events, data or results already obtained is truthfully stated within defined criteria, scope and materiality.Read the full definition records. |
| AustraliaAU | Conditional | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningACL s.18 | Per-ingredient evidence. |
Review your exact wording
Next, add your wording, evidence and market context for a guided review.
Review your exact wordingEvidence context
Standards and schemes relevant to this claim
These relationships are conditional. A listed standard does not automatically prove every use of the claim.