Claims assessment · Fund claim
Paris-aligned fund
Typical treatment across 5 reviewed regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
5 reviewed markets · one comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Restricted | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningBenchmark Reg (EU) 2019/2089 — PAB/CTB regulated labels (7% p.a. decarbonisation, exclusions) | Use PAB/CTB designation or qualify Dictionary termAlignmentThe deliberate process of making strategies, requirements, incentives, data or actions consistent enough to support a shared objective without necessarily making them identical.Read the full definition basis |
| United KingdomUK | Restricted | View legal reasoningFCA naming rules | Label/conditions; methodology disclosure |
| United StatesUS | Conditional | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningSEC Names Rule | 80% policy |
| CanadaCA | Restricted | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningCSA guidance | Consistency |
| AustraliaAU | Restricted | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningASIC | Dictionary termReasonable groundsForward-looking claims need reasonable grounds at the time made or are deemed misleadingRead the full definition |
Review your exact wording
Next, add your wording, evidence and market context for a guided review.
Review your exact wordingEvidence context
Standards and schemes relevant to this claim
These relationships are conditional. A listed standard does not automatically prove every use of the claim.