Claims assessment · Entity claim
Offset-free climate action
Typical treatment across 5 reviewed regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
5 reviewed markets · one comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Conditional | View legal reasoningUCPD | Verifiable that no offsets count toward the stated goal |
| United KingdomUK | Conditional | View legal reasoningCMA Code | Same |
| United StatesUS | Conditional | View legal reasoningFTC s.5 | Substantiate accounting boundary |
| CanadaCA | Conditional | View legal reasonings.74.01(1)(b.2) | Methodology |
| AustraliaAU | Conditional | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningACL s.18 | Dictionary termSubstantiationThe documented body of relevant, reliable and current evidence that supports the exact wording, scope, comparison and overall impression of a claim before and while it is communicated.Read the full definition |
Review your exact wording
Next, add your wording, evidence and market context for a guided review.
Review your exact wording