Claims assessment · Product claim
Dictionary termNon-toxicCompetent scientific evidence covering foreseeable use and misuseRead the full definition
Typical treatment across 5 reviewed regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
5 reviewed markets · one comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Restricted | View legal reasoningUCPD Art. 6; CLP Regulation context | Only where the product meets Dictionary termHazardA source, situation, or act with the potential to cause injury or ill health — the starting point of all occupational risk management.Read the full definition -classification exclusions and no realistic exposure risk; blanket claims on mixtures criticised. |
| United KingdomUK | Conditional | View legal reasoningCMA Green Claims Code | Absolute 'Dictionary termNon-toxicCompetent scientific evidence covering foreseeable use and misuseRead the full definition ' claims high-risk; qualify scope and exposure conditions. |
| United StatesUS | Conditional | View legal reasoningFTC Green Guides 16 CFR 260.10 | Dictionary termNon-toxicCompetent scientific evidence covering foreseeable use and misuseRead the full definition claims need competent scientific evidence covering foreseeable use and misuse. |
| CanadaCA | Conditional | View legal reasoningCompetition Act s.74.01(1)(b.1) | Prior adequate and proper testing covering the full formulation. |
| AustraliaAU | Conditional | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningACL s.18 | Must not overstate safety vs comparable products. |
Review your exact wording
Next, add your wording, evidence and market context for a guided review.
Review your exact wording