Claims assessment · Sector claim
Low-carbon concrete
Typical treatment across 5 reviewed regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
5 reviewed markets · one comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Conditional | View legal reasoningUCPD; CPR/EPD regime (EN 15804) | EPD-verified GWP vs reference mix; % reduction quantified per mix design, not portfolio-average. |
| United KingdomUK | Conditional | View legal reasoningCMA Code | EPD basis and comparison mix disclosed. |
| United StatesUS | Conditional | View legal reasoningFTC 260.4; Buy Clean (GSA/EPA EPD programme) | Third-party verified EPD; project-specific GWP. |
| CanadaCA | Conditional | View legal reasoningCompetition Act s.74.01(1)(b.2) | ISO 14025 EPD methodology. |
| AustraliaAU | Conditional | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningACL s.18 | EPD Dictionary termVerificationThe evidence-based confirmation that a claim about events, data or results already obtained is truthfully stated within defined criteria, scope and materiality.Read the full definition ; ACCC construction-sector attention. |
Review your exact wording
Next, add your wording, evidence and market context for a guided review.
Review your exact wording