Claims assessment · Fund naming claim
Impact fund
Typical treatment across 5 reviewed regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
5 reviewed markets · one comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Restricted | View legal reasoningSFDR 2.0 proposal COM(2025)633 introduces 'impact' category; current: SFDR Art 9 logic | Measurable impact intentionality; Dictionary termContributionA substantiated causal role played by an intervention within a wider set of influences, supported by a credible theory of change and evidence that expected mechanisms operated.Read the full definition evidence |
| United KingdomUK | Restricted | View legal reasoningFCA SDR 'Sustainable Impact' label — pre-defined measurable positive impact; contribution theory | Impact thesis, measurement framework, 70% test |
| United StatesUS | Restricted | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningSEC marketing rule; Names Rule | Substantiate impact measurement |
| CanadaCA | Restricted | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningCSA guidance | Consistency |
| AustraliaAU | Restricted | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningASIC | PDS Dictionary termAccuracyA core quality principle for emissions and sustainability data: reported values should be systematically neither over- nor understated, with uncertainty reduced as far as practicable.Read the full definition |
Review your exact wording
Next, add your wording, evidence and market context for a guided review.
Review your exact wording