Standards & schemes

Social & Labor Convergence Program (SLCP)

SLCP

Assessment framework
Issuer / operator
SLCP
Geography
Global
Sectors
Apparel, footwear, textiles
Scope unit
Facility
Current edition
Converged Assessment Framework (CAF) v1.7
Edition status
Published
Next edition review
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact
Access to standard text
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact
Engagement output
Evidence without a verdict
Performed by
APSCA-registered
Subject matter
Social and labour
Oversight body
SLCP

In brief

What this profile covers

The Social & Labor Convergence Program operates the Converged Assessment Framework (CAF, v1.7), a shared data-collection tool for working conditions in apparel and footwear supply chains. SLCP's design goal is audit reduction: one facility assessment, verified by an SLCP-approved verifier (verifiers must be APSCA-registered), can be shared with multiple brand customers instead of each brand auditing separately. Its defining discipline for claims: SLCP produces verified data, not a verdict. There is no score, certificate or pass/fail — the facility's answers are verified for accuracy and the buyer applies its own standards to the results. Facilities own their data and choose which buyers to share it with through SLCP's gateway and accredited host platforms. The programme is governed multi-stakeholder — brands, manufacturers, workers' organisations — and publishes signatories, making its convergence claim checkable. An SLCP assessment does not by itself demonstrate compliance with any buyer code or labour law, nor does it guarantee a favourable outcome.

Conditional relationships

Claims it may support

A relationship does not mean that the standard proves or validates every use of a claim.

Living wages across our supply chain by 2030Provides evidence relevant to · Provides assurance/verification statements relevant to the claim; it is a body, not a standard.
Evidence and conditions
Edition reviewed
Converged Assessment Framework (CAF) v1.7
Covered scope
Facility
Market
Global
Evidence normally needed
Verification statement from the body covering the claimed scope and period
Assurance
Verified self/joint assessment
Chain of custody
Not applicable — the scheme defines no chain-of-custody model
Relationship source ↗

Recognition & legal context

Laws referencing it

No reviewed law references are published.

Provenance5 profile updates
Profile update 5
Imported source-linked claim and dictionary relationship reviews. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 4
Added source-linked instrument, organisation and conformity classifications. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 3
Applied the owner/editor-approved Review 01 source and edition corrections. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 2
Initial profile published after recorded site-owner/editor review of the complete standards batch.
Profile update 1
Initial private editorial draft imported from the reviewed standards handover.

Have evidence, context or a correction?

Suggest a correction