Standards & schemes

Accountability Framework initiative

AFi coalition (CDP, WRI, WWF, Proforest, TNC et al.)

Framework
Issuer / operator
AFi coalition (CDP, WRI, WWF, Proforest, TNC et al.)
Geography
Global
Sectors
Agriculture, forestry, land-use commodities
Scope unit
Company
Current edition
AFi Core Principles (2019) + Operational Guidance (rolling)
Edition status
Published
Next edition review
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact
Access to standard text
Free
Alignment mechanism
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact
Instrument level
Supply chain
Public versioned standard
Yes
Verification route
None
Coverage vs target
Not yet reviewed. Help review this fact

In brief

What this profile covers

The Accountability Framework initiative is a coalition — including CDP, WRI, WWF, Proforest and The Nature Conservancy — providing common definitions and 12 Core Principles for no-deforestation, no-conversion and human-rights commitments in agricultural and forestry supply chains. It covers the points companies otherwise define inconsistently: scope setting, cut-off dates, monitoring, traceability, remediation and reporting, with rolling Operational Guidance for application. AFi's role is harmonisation, not verification: it gives companies, standard-setters and investors a shared reference for what a deforestation-free commitment should contain, and its definitions are widely embedded in buyer policies and other standards. The Framework is maintained by a secretariat and coalition of environmental and human-rights organisations, and its guidance is free to use. Companies ranging from traders to consumer brands reference AFi definitions in their commodity policies, and standard-setters align their own cut-off dates and traceability requirements with it — so its influence is mostly indirect, through the standards and policies that adopt its language. Alignment with these principles is a stated position, not a certification; it does not by itself demonstrate compliance or outcomes.

Conditional relationships

Claims it may support

A relationship does not mean that the standard proves or validates every use of a claim.

No deforestation across primary commodities by end-2025Provides evidence relevant to · Alignment with the framework is relevant evidence; frameworks define process, not outcomes — claim wording must not imply certification.
Evidence and conditions
Edition reviewed
AFi Core Principles (2019) + Operational Guidance (rolling)
Covered scope
Company / supply chain
Market
Global
Evidence normally needed
Documented alignment with the framework's criteria (targets, disclosures or methodology as applicable)
Assurance
Guidance framework; assurance via aligned reporting systems (CDP etc.)
Chain of custody
Not applicable — the scheme defines no chain-of-custody model
Relationship source ↗
96.7% of primary supply chains assessed as deforestation-freeProvides evidence relevant to · Alignment with the framework is relevant evidence; frameworks define process, not outcomes — claim wording must not imply certification.
Evidence and conditions
Edition reviewed
AFi Core Principles (2019) + Operational Guidance (rolling)
Covered scope
Company / supply chain
Market
Global
Evidence normally needed
Documented alignment with the framework's criteria (targets, disclosures or methodology as applicable)
Assurance
Guidance framework; assurance via aligned reporting systems (CDP etc.)
Chain of custody
Not applicable — the scheme defines no chain-of-custody model
Relationship source ↗

Recognition & legal context

Laws referencing it

No reviewed law references are published.

Provenance5 profile updates
Profile update 5
Imported source-linked claim and dictionary relationship reviews. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 4
Added source-linked instrument, organisation and conformity classifications. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 3
Applied the owner/editor-approved Review 01 source and edition corrections. Public profile remains Founding edition · public beta.
Profile update 2
Initial profile published after recorded site-owner/editor review of the complete standards batch.
Profile update 1
Initial private editorial draft imported from the reviewed standards handover.

Have evidence, context or a correction?

Suggest a correction