Claims assessment · Nutrition claim
No industrial trans fats in our foods
Typical treatment across 5 reviewed regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
5 reviewed markets · one comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Conditional | View legal reasoningUCPD; Reg 1924/2006 context; EU trans-fat limit (Reg 2019/649) | Compliant with the 2 g/100 g fat industrial trans-fat limit; portfolio-wide Dictionary termVerificationThe evidence-based confirmation that a claim about events, data or results already obtained is truthfully stated within defined criteria, scope and materiality.Read the full definition . |
| United KingdomUK | Conditional | View legal reasoningCMA Code; retained rules | Portfolio testing. |
| United StatesUS | Conditional | View legal reasoningFTC/FDA rules; PHO ban | Formulation records. |
| CanadaCA | Conditional | View legal reasoningCompetition Act s.74.01(1)(b.1) | Testing evidence. |
| AustraliaAU | Conditional | A direct source link has not yet been added for this assessment. View legal reasoningACL s.18; FSANZ | Formulation data. |
Review your exact wording
Next, add your wording, evidence and market context for a guided review.
Review your exact wording